Client feedback

Ann and her team are very knowledgeable and proactive, liaise well with our other advisers and provide the Trustees with an invaluable secretarial service.
Ian Edwards,
Chair of Trustees, Comet
​We are extremely pleased with the appointment we made. The way Ian reacts to us and works with us is brilliant. We are very happy.
Katherine Cross,
The work that has been done has been delivered beyond expectations.
Head of Trustee Services
Many organisations and people provide the services that clients need. In my opinion, the differentiator is in the way those services are provided and to that extent, Kathy embodies the qualities that I have come to value from PSITL. Kathy is organised but not fussy; diligent but not dogmatic; persistent without being pushy and compliant in a pragmatic way. Whilst she takes ownership and drives issues forward, Kathy is a team player who uses her and her colleagues experience to provide services to her trustee client whilst working closely with those like me representing the sponsoring employer. She works collaboratively with advisers but constructively challenges the scope of services, fees and service standards whenever necessary and makes sure that member needs are always taken into account. I enjoy working with her and trust that she will deliver what is required by the trustee and the members they represent in a manner satisfactory to the sponsoring employer.
Stuart Barker,
Internal Pensions Consultant, RSPCA
The Trustee Training course is very good. Excellent coverage of material presented in an easy-to-digest manner and quality of presentation by both presenters.
Jonathan Williams ,
Bangor University
PSGS offered the right support at very short notice, at reasonable cost, when we really needed it
Ian Edwards,
Chair of Trustee, Comet Pension Scheme
image for Distressed pension schemes | CVA | RAAs

Distressed pension schemes

A pension scheme or scheme sponsor in distress is a complex and difficult time for pension trustees. Specialist help is usually needed to find the solution that offers the best protection for member benefits.

A pension scheme facing an extreme funding deficit and/or sponsoring employer facing insolvency is serious. There is no simple solution to such complex situations - many approaches to restructure pension schemes can be considered. Employer insolvency and entry into the Pension Protection Fund (PPF) is not necessarily inevitable.

We have an extensive track record of acting as independent trustee for pension schemes in PPF assessment. However, our experience shows outcomes can be improved if we are appointed as professional trustee to a distressed pension scheme well ahead of PPF entry.

Approaches to restructuring and insolvency

We help pension trustees and pension scheme sponsors understand the issues they face as well as the approaches available to them, such as:

Regulated Apportionment Arrangement (RAA)

This is a restructuring technique available to some sponsoring employers enabling them to break ties with their defined benefit (DB) scheme and potentially avoid an otherwise inevitable insolvency. The pension scheme usually enters the PPF or, where funding is sufficient, member benefits are bought out above PPF levels (a PPF+ buy out).

This complex process requires liaison with both the Pensions Regulator (tPR) and PPF. A clearance application must be submitted to tPR before the PPF will become involved. The PPF’s restructuring principles must also be met.

Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA)

This is a legal agreement between an insolvent employer and its creditors to pay back a compromised amount over a set period of time, in order for the employer to continue trading. As a DB pension scheme is often the largest creditor, pension trustee consent is usually needed for a CVA to be put in place.

Where the CVA affects the company pension scheme, the PPF’s restructuring principles must be met and the PPF would expect the CVA to produce a better outcome for pension members than would be achieved through standard insolvency.

PPF+ compromise

A PPF+ compromise deal involves the pension trustees agreeing to buy out member benefits at a level higher than would be provided under the PPF. This agreement may be with the scheme sponsor, where they are solvent but in crisis, or involve the PPF where the employer is insolvent but the scheme is sufficiently well funded to secure benefits at a greater than PPF level.

Case study - SR Technics (airline supplier)

Objective: help an employer struggling to meet its UK pension obligations

What we did: following agreement of a compromise of the scheme's debt with the Swiss parent company (cleared by the Pensions Regulator), the scheme entered PPF assessment. As the scheme was funded above PPF benefits, a ‘light touch’ assessment process was agreed. A c£200m buyout at 120% of PPF benefits was then completed.

Read the full case study

If your pension scheme is in distress or the scheme sponsor is at risk of insolvency, we can help find the optimum outcome. Contact us to find out more.

Speak direct to our specialist in this area

Picture of Alex Davies Director at PSGS

Alex Davies


Or call us on:

0845 313 0024

Our specialist PPF team

HR Trustees PPF team

Read more


Is AAF just a tick box exercise for the Pensions Regulator?

Wind up/buy out

Are you really sure…? Learning lessons from PPF cases

Hot topic

It’s like asking the Queen to direct the government over Brexit

De-risking research

Read PSGS’ de-risking survey results

Exit management & de-risking

Achieving financial certainty in closing pension schemes

Call: 0845 313 0024

online enquiry