Client feedback


Very responsive to any queries we have and proactive in managing our scheme to the best. Very happy with the support we are getting.
Caroline Rand ,
Historic Royal Palaces
Professional and forthcoming with support.
Martin Crees ,
Rabobank
Wish I'd had the opportunity to do the Trustee training course sooner!
Stuart Atkins,
Raleigh UK Ltd
Back in the day there was a large trustee board, with several independents (from the financial world) and the ex-Chairman of the company was offered the role as Chair of Trustees as a sweetener when he stepped down. Unionised company then divided - broad range of active members. They needed some expertise, consistency and leadership during this time. Wanted a serious/professional to lead and guide the trustees.
Dave Benstead ,
Diodes Zetex
They have helped us save much more and created a cohesive plan to de-risk whilst building an integrated pension team.
Sally-Anne Borrill,
T-Systems
Thanks for all your help!

New DC flexibility largely being ignored by members

Topic:

Hot topic

Date published:

Tuesday, 22 July 2014

HMRC has just published guidance about the changes to the way defined contribution (DC) scheme members can take their pensions that were announced in the Budget 2014. The guidance looks at how those who have already retired and taken benefits from their scheme, or intend to do so before 6 April 2015, can take advantage of the increased flexibility.

PSIT acts as trustee represents a large number of DC members and, anecdotally, we have seen little change in the behaviour of members who have retired since the Budget, or are in the process of doing so now. Where members are being offered the chance to defer taking their benefits, they simply aren’t doing so. Of 40,000 or so DC members within the schemes we work with, not even one quarter of one percent have expressed an interest in the subject. Not one member has taken any action.

Perhaps now we have the HMRC guidance and schemes start talking about the new flexibility more, we will see a higher number of members choosing to defer taking benefits or repay lump sums. However, based on our experience of schemes that have already been communicating options clearly, we are not convinced there will be a mad rush to do something different. We suspect, for the vast majority of members, it will be ‘business as usual’ and they will carry on making the same choices as they would have before George Osborne announced the contents of his big red box in March.

What might be interesting to see is the secondary impact of this change and how the annuity market and annuity brokers react. Let’s not forget this easement was introduced to deal with the current poor annuity terms available to members, which may not last forever. Perhaps, in a time when we are all driving lamborghinis, we will follow in Australia’s footsteps and need to look at again forcing people to take an annuity…

 

 

Back to opinions

 

Hot topics


PSGS & 20-20 Trustees merge to form Vidett
Hot Topic

Punter Southall Governance Services (PSGS) & 20-20 Trustees (20-20) have today announced they...

Read more »


Don’t be surprised that your gilt funds are being treated like an emerging market
Image of Hot Topic author Sophia Harrison, Client Director

You may have seen or heard about the article in the Financial Times about how Insight...

Read more »


More opinions »


Call: 0118 207 2900

online enquiry