Client feedback

​Ian has added more value than we thought he would at the start… which shows it pays to go with someone who is doing the job of a professional trustee as their bread and butter.
Katherine Cross,
In any major corporate transaction, time is of the essence. PSGS's pragmatic commercial approach helped us manage the pensions aspects of our group re-structure to ensure a positive outcome for all parties.
David Wilman,
CFO at Survitec Group
​I would recommend them to anyone - I have dealt with a number of other independent trustee firms and would rate PSGS as the best. We are very happy with Mark and the service we get.
Julia Morton,
Camellia plc
PSGS were overall more professional than others.
Paul Staniland,
The work that has been done has been delivered beyond expectations.
Head of Trustee Services
So much more proactive than the previous company. On the ball - thinking in advance of things needing doing - very proactive.
Paul Rudd ,
Chairman of Trustees, Express Newspaper

From a simple admin error to a data security problem

One of my pension scheme clients was recently advised by their administrator of an error that had occurred with the issuing of payslips. This could easily affect any pension trustee board and it is important - it directly relates to data security.

How sure can you be?

It was only when they heard about this problem that the pension trustees became aware that the scheme administrator outsourced the issuing of payslips. The trustees also realised they could not be certain whether any of their scheme advisers used other providers in delivering services to the pension scheme.

With no direct agreement in place, trustees may not be aware of what information is going to external companies and have no knowledge of their processes and security protections. In this case, the trustee board agreed they needed to have a better understanding of all the providers being used.

It started with a slip…

The issue that started this was a straightforward administrative error. The payslip for a member of pension scheme A was inserted into the envelope of a member of pension scheme B, together with that individual’s own payslip. In theory, this shouldn’t have been able to happen as they are members of different schemes. In practice, it did happen.

There was no data security breach for my client - scheme B - it just raised the question of who handles data that the pension trustees are unaware of. The trustees have asked the administrator (and their other scheme advisers) to draft a schedule detailing who they provide data to and why so they can collate a complete list and fully understand where services are outsourced and/or where data is provided to other parties.

Of course, we advised the trustees of scheme A about what had happened. For them, the data breach could be much more serious.



Back to opinions


Call: 0845 313 0024

online enquiry