Client feedback


PSGS was chosen because of their knowledge of the subject and awareness of our particular schemes.
George Batho ,
Trustee, Lansing Linde
Excellent service - as expected and why PSGS was chosen.
Stuart Barker ,
Independent Occupational Pensions Consultant, RSPCA
Thanks for all your help!
In any major corporate transaction, time is of the essence. PSGS's pragmatic commercial approach helped us manage the pensions aspects of our group re-structure to ensure a positive outcome for all parties.
David Wilman,
CFO at Survitec Group
​Ian has added more value than we thought he would at the start… which shows it pays to go with someone who is doing the job of a professional trustee as their bread and butter.
Katherine Cross,
Tyser
Many organisations and people provide the services that clients need. In my opinion, the differentiator is in the way those services are provided and to that extent, Kathy embodies the qualities that I have come to value from PSITL. Kathy is organised but not fussy; diligent but not dogmatic; persistent without being pushy and compliant in a pragmatic way. Whilst she takes ownership and drives issues forward, Kathy is a team player who uses her and her colleagues experience to provide services to her trustee client whilst working closely with those like me representing the sponsoring employer. She works collaboratively with advisers but constructively challenges the scope of services, fees and service standards whenever necessary and makes sure that member needs are always taken into account. I enjoy working with her and trust that she will deliver what is required by the trustee and the members they represent in a manner satisfactory to the sponsoring employer.
Stuart Barker,
Internal Pensions Consultant, RSPCA
image for Pension scheme risk reviews | Integrated risk management | PSGS | Risk management

Pensions risk management

Understanding and managing risk is an integral part of running a scheme and achieving good pension scheme governance.


The Pensions Regulator’s (tPR) code of practice for funding defined benefit (DB) schemes focuses on pension trustees adopting an integrated approach to three key areas of risk:

1. the employer covenant
2. investment
3. funding

These three risk areas interact so each must be identified and assessed before pension trustees can make informed decisions on key pensions management issues such as setting scheme investment and funding strategies. These risks should then be monitored using a risk management framework proportionate to the size of scheme and budget available.

Pension scheme risk management is not simply a case of protecting against negative events - monitoring investment and funding risks enables pension trustees to plan de-risking strategies. In future, pension fund trustees may need to move away from using a single risk register - having a clearer distinction between operational and strategic risks may be beneficial.

To assess whether there are any gaps in your pension trustees’ risk management planning, ask yourself:

  • Do the trustees fully understand the risks faced by the scheme and the interaction between those risks?
  • Are the trustees comfortable with the level of risk being taken?
  • If any risk is excessive, have the trustees considered what action could be taken to reduce the risk?
  • Is there a framework in place to monitor investment, employer covenant and funding risks?
  • What would happen in the event of a significant change in investment returns, employer covenant or funding level? Is there a strategy in place to take mitigation actions?
Pension scheme risk reviews

An independent review helps demonstrate the importance you place on good pension scheme governance and compliance, as well as helping ensure you are meeting legal requirements and reflecting best practice guidance.

The Punter Southall Governance Services risk review:

  • tests the adequacy of your internal controls
  • checks the effectiveness of scheme policies
  • assesses the accuracy, efficiency and compliance of pension scheme management procedures, such as key administration tasks and your trustee discretion process
  • helps you better understand the full range of pension scheme risks and develop an integrated risk management framework

Like all PSGS’s pension scheme services, our risk review is tailored to suit the size and complexity of your scheme and your particular requirements, but can be based on one of our core review packages:

  • Essential: an ideal initial, high level assessment, or regular review within a formal governance framework
  • Advanced: a more in-depth review, either to give an extra layer of confidence or because there may be an issue that needs attention

To find out more about our pension scheme risk reviews and how they might benefit your scheme, contact us to talk it through or request our risk review service flyer.

Speak direct to our specialist in this area

Picture of Clare Owen independent trustee at PSIT

Clare Owen

Director of Outsourced Pension Services

Or call us on:

0845 313 0024

Read more

De-risking research

Read PSGS’ de-risking survey results

Hot topic

Trying not think about Brexit?

Integrated risk management plans

A request to pension trustee advisers

Case study

Lessons learned from a £600m buy in

PSGS risk review service

Find out how a PSGS risk review could benefit your pension scheme

PSGS blog

Redress claims: Lots of pain, little gain

PSGS adviser review service

More details about how we can help you review your scheme advisers


Call: 0845 313 0024

online enquiry